Legal Opinion

City of Spokane v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1939No. 27437. En BancPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

In July, 1938, this court handed down an opinion in the case of Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Henneford, 195 Wash. 553, 81 P. (2d) 786, in which it held that, in enacting Title IY, Laws of 1935, chapter 180, p. 726, as amended by Laws of 1937, chapter 191, p. 943, Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 8370-31 [P. C. § 7030-91] et seq., levying a tax “for the privilege of using” within the state of Washington “any article of tangible personal property purchased subsequent to April 30," 1935,” it was the legislative intent that such tax should not be levied with respect to the use of articles not available…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  4. Hamilton v. RathboneSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. In Re LavineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Shelton Hotel Co., Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Woodson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Olin Corp. v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGCY.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Bayha v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1952

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API