Legal Opinion

St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co. v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1952No. 31924PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The St. Paul and Tacoma Lumber Company, hereinafter called the company, has attacked the validity of one phase of the state use tax by a suit for refund of taxes paid. The tax in question is imposed by § 31 of the revenue act of 1935 as last amended (Laws of 1949, chapter 228, § 7, p. 829; Rem. Supp. 1949, § 8370-31) on every person who (1) uses, (2) as a consumer, (3) tangible personal property which he has (a) purchased at retail, (b) acquired by lease, (c) acquired by gift, or (d) extracted, produced or manufactured. The tax is three per cent of the value of the article used. Exemptions…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Spokane v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Klickitat County v. JennerWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. State Ex Rel. Hansen v. SalterWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. In Re SanbornWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Buffelen Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hundred East Credit Corp. v. Eric Schuster Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  3. City of Fircrest v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State Ex Rel. Hagan v. Chinook Hotel, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. G-P Gypsum Corp. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API