Legal Opinion

Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 29, 1937No. 418PublishedCited by 427 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo

A statute of Washington taxing the use of chattels in that state is assailed in this suit as a violation of the commerce clause (Constitution of the United States, Article I, § 8) in so far as the tax is applicable to chattels purchased in another state and used in Washington thereafter.

Plaintiffs (appellees in this court) are engaged either as contractors or as subcontractors in the construction of the Grand Coulee Dam on the Columbia River. In the performance of that work they have brought into the state of Washington machinery, materials and supplies, such as locomotives, cars, conveyors,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Burnet v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by427 opinions

  1. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

422 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API