Legal Opinion

Woodson v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1980No. 46279PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stafford, J. —

The sole issue in this case is whether the license held by petitioner Thomas Woodson, an osteopathic physician, prevented him from prescribing, dispensing and administering drugs. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's order granting partial summary judgment in favor of defendants and concluded Woodson was not so authorized. Woodson v. State, 22 Wn. App. 499, 589 P.2d 828 (1979). We affirm.

Since 1946 petitioner Woodson has held a "certificate to practice osteopathy" granted pursuant to Laws of 1919, ch. 4. It appears this is the only such limited certificate presently…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Fahn v. Cowlitz CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. HouckWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Pannell v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Witherspoon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. FenterWashington Supreme Court · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Price v. Kitsap TransitWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. City of Spokane v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. City of Spokane v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. City of Yakima v. International Ass'n of Fire FightersWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. DabkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API