Woodson v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Stafford, J. —
The sole issue in this case is whether the license held by petitioner Thomas Woodson, an osteopathic physician, prevented him from prescribing, dispensing and administering drugs. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's order granting partial summary judgment in favor of defendants and concluded Woodson was not so authorized. Woodson v. State, 22 Wn. App. 499, 589 P.2d 828 (1979). We affirm.
Since 1946 petitioner Woodson has held a "certificate to practice osteopathy" granted pursuant to Laws of 1919, ch. 4. It appears this is the only such limited certificate presently…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fahn v. Cowlitz CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. HouckWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Pannell v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Witherspoon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. FenterWashington Supreme Court · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Price v. Kitsap TransitWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Spokane v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Spokane v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Yakima v. International Ass'n of Fire FightersWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. DabkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.