Legal Opinion

Bayha v. Public Utility District No. 1

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1939No. 27789PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This is an action instituted June 19,1939, by John Á. Bay ha, on behalf of himself and all other taxpayers of the city of Aberdeen similarly situated, against public utility district No. 1 of Grays Harbor county, a municipal corporation, and C. B. Sherwood, H. E. Bailey and Oliver Morris, as commissioners of such district, defendants, whereby plaintiff sought to enjoin and restrain the defendants from purchasing or entering into any contract or commitment for the purchase of any of the electric utilities of the Grays Harbor Railway & Light Company without first submitting the question of such…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. State ex rel. Smith v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Kuhn v. BuhlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Towson v. DensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  5. Ponischil v. Hoquiam Sash & Door Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Hi-Starr, Inc. v. Liquor Control BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Groves v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Hite v. Public Utility District No. 2Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State Ex Rel. P.U.D. Etc. v. WylieWashington Supreme Court · 1947

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API