Potter v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. (Green, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
Plaintiff sued for damages as resulting from an injury at a crossing on the morning of February 27, 1883.
Plaintiff and two other persons, who had been working at a lumber camp near Farwell, left the camp that morning about day-break, and reached Farwell not far from 8 o’clock. After a short stop they started again in two sleighs, and went down the highway between one and two miles before reaching the ' place of the accident. The front sleigh belonged to one Graham, and two horses, belonging to plaintiff, were hitched to it behind. Plaintiff followed in another sleigh driven by one Martindale,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Mynning v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Manos v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Grostick v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Matta v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Klanowski v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.