Legal Opinion

Matta v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1888PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Berrien. (Smith, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiff brought suit for damages resulting from the death of her intestate, who was killed upon a highway crossing known as the “ Plee Crossing,” in the township of Lincoln, Berrien county.

The declaration alleged negligence in the defendant’s failure to give any notice or warning of the approach of its train to such crossing, either by sounding a whistle, ringing a bell, or otherwise.

The evidence of the witnesses for the plaintiff was that none of them heard any whistle sounded or bell rung until the train struck the cattle-guard at the crossing.

The accident was witnessed by James G-.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mynning v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Haas v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Mynning v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Ecliff v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Bouwmeester v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Gillett v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Kirby v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hanlon v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API