Legal Opinion

Klanowski v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1887PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Chambers, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are -stated in the opinion, and in 57 Mich. 525.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

This was a suit brought to recover damages suffered by plaintiff in the same transaction that resulted in the death of his father, on behalf of whose estate a recovery was had, affirmed by division of this Oourt in the case of Klanowski v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co., 57 Mich. 525. In the present case some new facts were brought out, and the record presents some questions not fully developed before. Plaintiff recovered damages. It will not be necessary to give many details, as they would be to some extent a repetition of the old decision.

We observe that all of the counts in the declaration in this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carver v. Detroit & Saline Plank Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People v. MorriganMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Klanowski v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Potter v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Horn v. BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  2. Nosler v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  3. Brooke v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  4. People v. DeitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. People v. RayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API