Legal Opinion

Grostick v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1892PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Livingston. (Newton, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The plaintiff had verdict and judgment in the court below for $18,143.50. The action was brought *595in the circuit court for Livingston county for the negligent killing of August Grostick, plaintiff's husband, on the afternoon of October 19, 1889, on a highway crossing just west of the station at Howell, on defendant's road.

The negligence alleged in the declaration is that defendant failed to sound its whistle or ring its bell continuously for at least 40 rods before reaching the crossing; ran over the crossing at a great rate of speed, the crossing being a dangerous one; and the employment of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Mynning v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Haas v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Potter v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gillett v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Baker v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Baker v. DelanoMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  5. Manos v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API