Legal Opinion

Thomson v. City of Racine

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

In this action for declaratory relief under sec. 269.56, Stats., plaintiff seeks judgment declaring illegal and void an ordinance enacted on October 7, 1941; by the common council of the city of Racine. It suffices for the purpose of determining the contentions on this appeal from an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, on the ground that the facts alleged are insufficient to constitute a cause of action, to note the following facts. In March, 1941, prior to the enactment of the ordinance, plaintiff, as trustee for the property of the Chicago & North Western Railway…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Clark v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hickman v. WellauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Duluth Street Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  5. City of Baraboo v. DwyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Law Enforcement Standards Board v. Village of Lyndon StationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Josam Manufacturing Co. v. State Board of HealthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Martinez v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Department of Natural Resources v. City of ClintonvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Opinion No. Oag 71-77, (1977), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API