Legal Opinion

Department of Natural Resources v. City of Clintonville

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1971No. 203PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

In the city of Clintonville there is a millpond created by the damming of Pigeon River which runs through the city. On July 10, 1968, the gates of the dam were opened at the direction of aider-man Hangartner of the Clintonville common council and the level of the pond was lowered approximately 30 inches. On July 24, 1968, upon a similar order of Hangartner, the pond was lowered to the level of the riverbed. These lowerings were without the permission of the DNR as required by sec. 31.02, Stats., 1 and the second drawdown was in violation of a 1936 order of the DNR 2 fixing the minimum level…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Muench v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Scanlon v. City of MenashaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Corstvet v. Bank of DeerfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hoeft v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. In Re Estate of HaeseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Nelson v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  5. State v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API