Opinion No. Oag 71-77, (1977)
Wisconsin Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
GLENN L. HENRY, Corporation Counsel Dane County
You present a number of problems which had arisen in making protective placements under sec. 55.06, Stat,.
Your first question is:
1. When the evaluation and evidence disclose that an individual in need of placement has a continuing history of violent behavior, which agency bears the ultimate responsibility for a) locating. b) providing, and c) funding an appropriate facility?
I assume you use the term "ultimate" in the sense of basic or fundamental, which is one of the definitions appearing inWebsters 3rd New International Dictionary, Unabridged.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Columbia County v. Board of Trustees of Wisconsin Retirement FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. RamsayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Verbeten v. HuettlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Thomson v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Department of Taxation v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rolo v. GoersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Opinion No. Oag 22-92, (1992), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1992
- Opinion No. Oag 25-87, (1987), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1987
- Opinion No. Oag 28-84, (1984), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1984
- Opinion No. Oag 34-90, (1990), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1990