Legal Opinion

Opinion No. Oag 71-77, (1977)

Wisconsin Attorney General Reports

Decided August 23, 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLENN L. HENRY, Corporation Counsel Dane County

You present a number of problems which had arisen in making protective placements under sec. 55.06, Stat,.

Your first question is:

1. When the evaluation and evidence disclose that an individual in need of placement has a continuing history of violent behavior, which agency bears the ultimate responsibility for a) locating. b) providing, and c) funding an appropriate facility?

I assume you use the term "ultimate" in the sense of basic or fundamental, which is one of the definitions appearing inWebsters 3rd New International Dictionary, Unabridged.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Columbia County v. Board of Trustees of Wisconsin Retirement FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. RamsayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Verbeten v. HuettlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Thomson v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Department of Taxation v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rolo v. GoersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Opinion No. Oag 22-92, (1992), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1992
  3. Opinion No. Oag 25-87, (1987), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1987
  4. Opinion No. Oag 28-84, (1984), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1984
  5. Opinion No. Oag 34-90, (1990), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API