Hicks v. Butterworth
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a new trial. M. T. Booling, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff on account of trespass committed by defendant’s livestock.
The case was tried before a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff, upon which a judgment was entered against defendant, whose motion for a new trial was denied and from which order he appeals.
It appears that plaintiff was a tenant in possession, under a lease from, the owner, of the premises involved, upon which at the time of the trespass he had certain fields of alfalfa growing, and a lot of unbaled hay in the stack; that during the period extending…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clarke v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Blevins v. MullallyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Holt Manufacturing Co. v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Coalinga Pacific Oil & Gas Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Reeves v. HannanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
3Cited by7 opinions
- Williams v. GoodwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Silveira v. OhmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Montezuma Improvement Co. v. SimmerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Goodwin v. BradenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Davis v. BlasingameCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.