Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Hannan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 19, 1900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On error to the Cumberland Circuit..

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gummere, J.

On March 21st, 1895, Hannan, the plaintiff in error, who was the owner of a farm in Cumberland county, entered into an agreement, under seal, with Reeves, the defendant in error, by which he did “demise, grant and farm *250let” said farm to the latter for the term of one year from the 25th day of said month of March, the latter agreeing to pay or yield therefor “two extra loads of hay (which the said Hannan reserves for his own nse), one-half of the proceeds of all hay sold, and. also one-half of all potatoes and crops grown on the farm.” Hannan…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ratliffe v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. State ex rel. Gillilian v. Municipal CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Hicks v. ButterworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  4. Rogers v. LawtonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin · 1908
  5. Eckman v. BeihlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API