Coalinga Pacific Oil & Gas Co. v. Associated Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action to recover the sum of $2,251.95 for 11,852.40 barrels of petroleum at nineteen cents per barrel, being the balance due on a contract by the terms of which plaintiff agreed to sell and defendant to buy 300,000 barrels of petroleum. For a second cause of action plaintiff claims the further sum of $3,597.62, alleged to be due for 8,994.06 barrels of petroleum sold and delivered to defendant by plaintiff under a contract entered into on or about January 28, 1908, at the rate of forty cents per barrel.
Defendant denies that plaintiff delivered any petroleum greater in amount than…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clarke v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Pierce v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Moreing v. WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Crowell v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Pedro v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Georgeous v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Hicks v. ButterworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.