Legal Opinion
Mollica v. Toohey
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 3, 2012No. AC 32536PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The plaintiffs, Denise Mollica, individually and as the next friend of Alexa Mollica and Daniel Mollica, appeal from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, Edward Toohey. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly concluded that there was no genuine issue of material fact that their action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the summary judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiffs commenced the present action on December 21, 2006, by way of a one count complaint. The plaintiffs…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Doty v. MucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Rosato v. MascardoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Schilberg Integrated Metals Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Bellemare v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Bellemare v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mills v. Solution, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Rickel v. KomaromiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Parnoff v. Aquarian Water Co. of Connecticut (AC40383)Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- McCullough v. World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Wojtkiewicz v. Middlesex HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.