Legal Opinion
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Cooperman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 4, 2008No. SC 18084PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
This appeal arises out of two separate actions brought by the plaintiffs, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London (underwriters), AXA Nordstem Art Insurance Corporation (AXA) and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh (National), against, respectively, the defendant, Steven G. Cooperman (Steven), and the defendant, Nancy Cooperman (Nancy), alleging fraudulent conveyance, statutory theft, conversion and conspiracy, and requesting damages and equi table relief. The cases were consolidated for trial. After a trial to the court, the trial court concluded that the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Metro Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Fichera v. Mine Hill Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Vilcinskas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Watts v. ChittendenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Foisie v. Worcester Polytechnic Inst.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co. v. BioHealth Labs., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Chien v. Skystar Bio Pharmaceutical Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Canty v. OttoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.