Legal Opinion

Rickel v. Komaromi

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 13, 2013No. AC 35062PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEAR, J.

The plaintiff, Caryn Rickel, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants Michael Komaromi and Roberta Komaromi with respect to the counts of her complaint sounding in nuisance and trespass.1 On appeal, the *777plaintiff claims that the court erred in rendering summary judgment because (1) it did not address the plaintiffs allegations and arguments in opposition to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment that the repeated bamboo encroachment from the defendants’ property to her property constituted a continuing nuisance and a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Pestey v. CushmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. Boone v. William W. Backus HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. Russo Farms, Inc. v. Vineland Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  5. Ramirez v. Health Net of the Northeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vaccaro v. Shell Beach Condominium, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  2. Geiger v. CareyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  3. CSL Silicones Inc. v. Midsun Group Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
  4. Wellswood Columbia, LLC v. Town of HebronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  5. Hayes v. CarriganOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API