Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Action Against Fahrenholtz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 7, 2017No. A15-1227PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case involves the question of whether we should impose reciprocal discipline on respondent Terri Lynn Fahrenholtz. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) served Fahrenholtz with a petition for reciprocal disciplinary action after the North Dakota Supreme Court disbarred Fahren-holtz from the practice of law in North Dakota for misappropriating client funds and abandoning the cases of at least eight clients, In re Fahrenholtz, 863 N.W.2d 239 (N.D. 2015). We hold that North Dakota’s disciplinary proceedings were fundamentally fair, and that the…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against LundeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against FairbairnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Stephen J. Baird, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0398840. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API