Legal Opinion
Dombalian v. Fox
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1979No. Civ. 44429PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HALVONIK, J.
Edward T. Powers, a licensed real estate broker, bilked respondent and her late husband. There were two stages to this operation, both involving one listing agreement for the same piece of real estate. The question is whether this fraud occurred in one transaction or two. Where there is an uncollectable judgment against a licensed real estate broker based on a fraudulent transaction, Business and Professions Code section 10471 permits recovery from the Real Estate Fund of up to $10,000 for each transaction.
In August of 1964 the late Henry Dombalian and respondent Agnes…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Nordahl v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- United States v. Pan-American Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Wachs v. WachsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Froid v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Booth v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Merrifield v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Edmonds v. AugustynCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Powers v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.