Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Booth v. Robinson

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1983No. AO19473PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LOW, P. J.

We hold that when a licensed real estate broker defrauds a person in a transaction during the course of assuming to act as a broker, the aggrieved person may, upon obtaining an unsatisfied final judgment, recover from the Real Estate Fund.

Mildred B. Robinson (Robinson), a then licensed real estate broker, fraudulently solicited a total of $18,500 from Archie and Dorothea Booth in two transactions. The Commissioner of Real Estate (Commissioner) appeals from an order directing payment out of the Real Estate Fund (Fund) pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 10470 et…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Viles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Antelope Valley Press v. PoiznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. In Re MossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Stickel v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Phillips v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Horning v. ShilbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API