Legal Opinion

Wachs v. Wachs

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1938No. S. F. 15937PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing of the instant appeal by this court after decision thereon by the District Court of Appeal has resulted in the conclusion that the decision that was rendered by the latter court is correct. The opinion therein, which was prepared by Mr. Justice Spence, is therefore adopted as the opinion of this court. It is as follows:

“Plaintiff brought this action upon a contract seeking to recover a share of certain commissions claimed to be due him under the terms of said contract: From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.
“For approximately ten years prior to October 1,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Tanner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  4. McNeny v. TouchstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Jenny Lind Co. v. Bower & Co.California Supreme Court · 1858

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Union Oil Co. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1948

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API