Legal Opinion
Powers v. Fox
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 28, 1979No. Civ. 54678PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, J.
The Real Estate Commissioner appeals from an order directing him to pay to respondent the sum of $25,956 from the Real Estate Recovery Fund. Admittedly, respondent was defrauded of $55,000 by the machinations of Mr. Powers; the sole question before this court is whether she is entitled, under sections 10471 and 10472 of the Business and Professions Code, to the sum so awarded. We conclude that she is not and reverse the order appealed from.
The applicable sections read as follows: Section 10471: “When any aggrieved person obtains a final judgment in any court of competent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sefton v. SeftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Interinsurance Exchange v. VeljiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Cottam v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Dombalian v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Clark v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3Cited by6 opinions
- Booth v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Merrifield v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Mary Grace Purganan v. Richard S. Schweiker , Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- CHANDRA VS. SCHULTENevada Supreme Court · 2019
- Brody v. AlfieriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.