Legal Opinion

People v. Stone

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1937No. Crim. No. 2936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

tem. — Defendant was convicted after trial by jury on two counts of grand theft.

Viewing the evidence most favorable to the prosecution (People v. Dukes, 90 Cal. App. 657, 659 [266 Pac. 558]), the facts in the instant case are:

Defendant on each of two separate occasions obtained $1,000 from the complaining witness, Charles F. Reder, upon the expressed promise that the money would not be used until and unless additional sums of money were obtained from other investors for the purpose of furnishing capital for an automobile finance business, further that, if the additional…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leavens v. Pinkham & McKevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Thatch v. LivingstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Koeberle v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. DukesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. People v. FlintCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API