People v. Ramirez
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
—Defendants appeal after trial by jury from judgments of guilty of (a) robbery in the second degree, and (b) rape. They also appeal from orders denying their motions for a new trial.
Viewing the evidence most favorable to the prosecution (People v. Buhes, 90 Cal. App. 657, 659 [266 Pac. 558]), the facts in the instant case are:
November 28, 1936, prosecutrix, Consuela Apodaca, at about 10:30 P. M., was waiting for a street car at the intersection of Gallardo and Maey Streets in the city of Los Angeles, when defendants stopped their car and forced her to accompany them, driving to the rear of a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. SieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Leavens v. Pinkham & McKevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Thatch v. LivingstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- People v. DukesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- People v. GrovesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. WhitsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. DunlopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. ArguilidaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.