Legal Opinion

People v. Flint

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1941No. Crim. No. 3421PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment of guilty of manslaughter after trial before a jury defendant appeals. There is also an appeal from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The evidence being viewed most favorably to the people (respondent), the essential facts are:

July 20, 1940, Charles M. Andreason was employed at Riley's Pool Hall in Bell, California. His duties included, among others, tending bar and making collections from card and pool games. Shortly after 11:00 p. m. Mr. Andrea-son told defendant to “check out” of a poker game in which he was engaged. Thereupon a discussion ensued between Mr.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. PianezziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. People v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thurman v. CluneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API