Legal Opinion

In re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices Litigation

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 26, 2005No. 02-1468-JWLPublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

O’HARA, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Introduction & Background.

This multidistrict litigation consists of numerous putative class action lawsuits arising from the practices of defendants AT & T Corporation and Sprint Communications Company of charging their customers to recoup their contributions to the federal Universal Service Fund (“USF”) program. Plaintiffs are customers or former customers of AT & T, Sprint, and MCI who allege an illegal scheme of conspiring to overcharge for USF surcharges, thereby creating a secret profit center.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Spraque v. Thorn Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. Debra A. And George Simon v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Interbake Foods, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  2. Kannaday v. BallDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
  3. Phillips v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2013
  4. Cooey v. StricklandDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  5. Muro v. Target Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API