Legal Opinion

Merlino v. West Coast Macaroni Manufacturing Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 14, 1949No. Civ. No. 13739PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Defendants demurred generally and specially to plaintiff’s first amended complaint. The trial court sustained the demurrer, and granted plaintiff 10 days to amend. *108Plaintiff failed to amend, and judgment was entered for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

The law applicable to such an appeal is well settled. “A plaintiff who has declined to amend his complaint, after a demurrer sustained, which is both general and special, must stand upon his pleading as against both grounds of demurrer.” (Aalwyn v. Cobe, 168 Cal. 165, 173 [142 P. 79]; see, also, California Trust Co. v. Cohn, 214 Cal. 619 [7 P.2d…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. People v. LimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. McKee v. DoddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Snyder v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Longshore v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Williams v. Beechnut Nutrition Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Singleton v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API