Legal Opinion
Harmon v. Hines
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 15, 1932No. 20885PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Y. C. J.
This is an action commenced in the district court of Sequoyah county by plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, against the defendants in error to recover for damages by reason of breach of warranty in a warranty deed. -
The parties appearing here as they appeared in the trial court, for convenience they will be designated as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff, by judgment of the district court, having been evicted from a one-fourth interest in lands purchased by plaintiff. All of the deeds in the chain of title were warranty deeds, expressly warranting the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Motsenbocker v. Shawnee Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- United States Fire Ins. Co. v. WhitchurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Anderson, Guardian v. MuhrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- E. Van Winkle Gin & MacHine Works v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Harmon v. NofireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cartwright v. Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Mabry v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Hines v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Oklahoma Transp. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Blackwell Oil & Gas Co. v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.