Armstrong v. May
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Murray County; H. W. Fielding, Judge. Action by R. E. May against G. W. Armstrong, Ben Hopson, and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants named bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HOOKER, C.
There are four assignments of error urged, which we will consider as they are presented.
1. The plaintiffs in error contend that the lower court should have sustained their motion to quash the summons, for the reason that the answer day as fixed by the summons was 22 days after the return day of summons. It is apparent, from an examination of the record, that the defendants below complaining of said summons had their full 20 days in which to answer, and therefore they were not deprived of any substantial right, and the proposition urged is not tenable.
2. Because the court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- McConnel v. KibbeIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
- The Oriental v. BarclayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Cogswell v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- City of Oklahoma City v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. All Parties and PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- United States Fire Ins. Co. v. WhitchurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Avery v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Continental Ins. Co. v. NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.