A. W. Swope & Son v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Payne County; before Frank Dale, District Judge. Action of replevin. Judgment was had for plaintiffs, from which defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Bierek, J.:
The plaintiffs brought their action in re-plevin in the district court of Payne county, to recover the possession of a stock of goods, of which, in their original petition, they alleged they were the owners, and of which they were unlawfully and wrongfully deprived of the possession by the defendants. In their amended petition they allege their right of possession of the stock under a chattel mortgage, given by the defendants to secure a promissory note given by them to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs brought suit in the partnership name of Burnham, Hanna,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rice v. HodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Mulhall v. MulhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Phillips v. GoldtreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Byers v. BourretCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Meads, Seaman & Co. v. LasarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Alcorn v. DennisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Terrapin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Kingfisher Mill & Elev. Co. v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.