Legal Opinion

Albertson v. FMC Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 21, 1989No. C2-88-1832PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Elaine Albertson appeals from summary judgment in favor of respondent FMC Corporation (FMC) on her claim of age discrimination. Albertson alleges that FMC terminated her employment under the pretext of poor performance on a skills rating which was conducted as part of a reduction in force. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant was originally hired by FMC’s Northern Ordnance Division (NOD) as a stenographer, and later worked in different positions, including customer service assistant, clerk, and secretary. In 1986, appellant was employed as a Secretary Grade 5 in the Product Support…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Thor C. LAUGESEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ANACONDA COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. James L. Miller v. Certainteed Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Certainteed Corporation Salaried Employees Pension Plan & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  2. Ward v. Employee Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Loren Noreen v. PharMerica CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  4. Adams v. West Publishing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
  5. Taylor v. LSI CORP. OF AMERICACourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API