Saldana v. Taco Bell of America, LLC
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOSEPH SALDANA, Case No. 2:20-cv-10660 Plaintiff, HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III v. TACO BELL #1510, Defendant. / OMNIBUS ORDER Defendant moved to deem its first requests for admissions ("RFAs") admitted. ECF 8. The Court denied the motion as moot because the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure deemed the RFAs admitted as a matter of law. ECF 14, PgID 83. Shortly after, Defendant moved for summary judgment and claimed that Plaintiff's admissions meant Plaintiff could not prove its negligence claim. ECF 16, PgID 92– 94.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aretha Tucker v. Union of Needletrades, Industrial, and Textile EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Chris R. Plott v. General Motors Corporation, Packard Electric DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Clt Logistics v. River West BrandsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Wells v. CORPORATE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLEDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- Dixon v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.