Legal Opinion
Aretha Tucker v. Union of Needletrades, Industrial, and Textile Employees
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 10, 2005No. 04-3312PublishedCited by 345 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
Aretha Tucker brought a hybrid claim under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185, against her former employer, the Union of Needletrades, Industrial, and Textile Employees (UNITE), and her former union, the Federation of Union Representatives (FOUR), when they refused to arbitrate the grievance that she had filed after being terminated from her employment. Tucker proceeded on a theory that she was a covered employee under the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) be tween UNITE and FOUR, and that they had violated the terms of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Terry Gilmour v. Gates, McDonald & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Stemler v. City of FlorenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by345 opinions
- Wahi v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Casey v. Geek Squad® Subsidiary Best Buy Stores, L.P.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. WB Music Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- CLOANINGER EX REL. EST. OF CLOANINGER v. McDevittCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- J.H. v. Williamson Cty., Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
340 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.