Legal Opinion

Clt Logistics v. River West Brands

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 4, 2011No. Case No.: 10-13282PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

VICTORIA A. ROBERTS, District Judge.

This is a trademark infringement action. Plaintiffs 1177216 Ontario Ltd. (“1177216 Ontario”) and CLT Logistics, Inc. (“CLT Logistics”), filed suit against Defendants Almar Sales Company, Inc. (“Almar”), River West Brands, LLC (“River West”), and Selective Beauty Brands, LLC (“SBB”), asserting that Defendants violated the Lanham Act and state law through unauthorized use of Plaintiffs’ SALON SELECTIVES trademarks.

Before the Court are three motions: (1) Defendants’ Motion to Stay, which asserts that abstention is proper in light of a parallel state-court…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Ajuba International, L.L.C. v. SahariaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
  2. Condom Sense v. Jamal Alshahabi, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
  3. Aleck v. Havenpark Management, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  4. Carter v. WashingtonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
  5. ChristNet Inc. v. Taylor, City ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API