Legal Opinion
Chris R. Plott v. General Motors Corporation, Packard Electric Division
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1995No. 94-3952PublishedCited by 197 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment dismissing his Title VII reverse discrimination suit against defendant General Motors Corporation (“GM”). We affirm for the reasons that follow.
I
A
In 1983, after a national investigation of GM’s employment practices by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the “EEOC”), GM and the EEOC entered into a Conciliation Agreement (the “Agreement”) covering GM facilities nationwide. Although GM denied all allegations of discrimination, the Agreement set various remedial employment goals. The provision relevant to this ease required GM to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United Steelworkers of America v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Taft Broadcasting Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by197 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. E.M.A. Nationwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Nathaniel Brent v. Wayne Cty. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. v. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Audi Ag and Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Bob D'amato, D/B/A Quattro EnthusiastsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Cacevic v. City of Hazel ParkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.