Legal Opinion

Wells v. CORPORATE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided February 8, 2010No. Case 1:07-cv-1214PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Fee Petition of Plaintiffs Counsel Guznack; Directing the Defendant to Pay $1,280 to Guznack

Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Fee Petition of Plaintiffs Counsel Lyngklip & Petrik; Directing Plaintiffs’ Counsel to File a Proposed Fee Award According to Hourly Rates Fixed Herein and Incorporating Adjustments Offered in their Reply Brief

PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Pamela Wells received $2,500 in damages for violations of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692k (“FDCPA”). The court determines,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Reed v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Gonter v. Hunt Valve Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. Coulter v. State Of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Clt Logistics v. River West BrandsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  2. Barrett v. Green Tree ServicingDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
  3. Loesel v. City of FrankenmuthDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  4. Aleck v. Havenpark Management, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  5. Allen David Daniel v. Teri Fighter-Daniel, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API