Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 22, 2016No. Case No. 2:13-cv-14340PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ■ DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DR. WIDMEY- • ER-. (document no. 41), DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DR. ANDRES ■ (document no. 42), PLAINTIFF’S THEORY OF GENERAL ■ MEDICAL CAUSATION (document no. 44), AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (document no. 43), AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO LIMIT THE OPINIONS OF EXPERTS (document no. 47)
STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, United States District Judge
Joseph Dixon worked as a carman for Defendant railroad company Grand Trunk *706Western Railroad Company (“Grand Trunk”). Dixon’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dunn v. PascoeDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2023
- Garvin v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022
- Giesing v. Schindler Elevator CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022
- Homer Powell, et al. v. American Strategic Insurance Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025
- Maki v. Federal Reserve Bank of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.