Charles Ehrlich & Co. v. J. Ellis Slater Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Frank C. Collier, John Schlegel, Louis F. Labarere, and. Walter H. Sprague for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action instituted by the plaintiffs against the appellant to recover the sum of $2,926.48 for the breach of a contract, by the terms of which the plaintiffs sold and delivered to the defendant f. o. b. California, three carloads of fruit for which one H. J. Martin issued three drafts, aggregating the agreed price of the fruit, upon the defendant at its office in Chicago, and which he signed “J. Ellis Slater Co., H. J. Martin.”
It is alleged in the complaint that the defendant is a corporation- created and existing under the laws of the state of Illinois, and throughout the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bushnell v. Consolidated Ice Machine Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Marshall v. KeachIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Brophy v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915
- Dickinson v. Zubiate Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Smith v. Farbenfabriken of Elberfeld Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- L. D. Reeder Contractors of Arizona, an Arizona Corporation v. Higgins Industries, Inc., a Louisiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Carl FW Borgward, GMBH v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- The Thew Shovel Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Perkins v. Louisville & N. R. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1951
- Carl FW Borgward, GMBH v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958