Carl FW Borgward, GMBH v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Macbeth & Ford and Moira Ford for Real Parties in Interest.
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Petitioner, Carl F. W. Borgward G. M. B. H., a German corporation, seeks a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court of Los Angeles County to enter its order quashing service of summons in an action brought by plaintiffs, the real parties in interest in this proceeding. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 416.3.) Earle C. Anthony, Inc., and Doe One to Doe Ten were joined as defendants in plaintiffs’ action. Borgward was served by making personal service on Lutz Knemeyer in California as its alleged “general manager in this State.’’ (Corp. Code, § 6500.) It appeared specially and moved to quash the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Henry R. Jahn & Son, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Mateo CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Hilyar v. Union Ice Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- West Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Eclipse Fuel Engineering Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- L. D. Reeder Contractors of Arizona, an Arizona Corporation v. Higgins Industries, Inc., a Louisiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Fisher Governor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Cosper v. Smith & Wesson Arms Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Owens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Empire Steel Corp. of Texas, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.