Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Zubiate Mining Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1909No. Civ. No. 737PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. W- P. James, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action to recover a sum of money paid in the purchase of mining stock, which purchase was made under an agreement for the repayment of the same. Judgment went for plaintiff, from which defendant appeals upon the judgment-roll accompanied by bill of exceptions.

Defendant was a foreign mining corporation authorized by its articles of incorporation to transact business in California. It is alleged in the complaint that at the time of the filing thereof and at all times mentioned therein defendant was engaged in the transaction of business in said state; that on December 7, 1903, plaintiff and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blood v. La Serena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bartlett v. Odd FelLows' Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Vent v. Duluth Coffee & Spice Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Jameson v. Simonds Saw Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. Phillips v. Sanger Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Schulte v. Boulevard Gardens Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Fuller v. LindenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Roehl v. the Texas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Goodman v. Global IndustriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API