Legal Opinion

Bushnell v. Consolidated Ice Machine Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1891PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. O. H. Horton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkin

This was a proceeding in chancery, by plaintiff in error, against defendants in error, begun in the circuit court of Cook county on the 27th day of October, A. D. 1889, the object of " which was to have the Consolidated Icé Machine Company declared a co-partnership, and its affairs settled between the complainant and defendants accordingly. In the circuit court a general demurrer was sustained to the bill, and a decree entered dismissing the same at complainant’s costs. From that ■ decree this writ of error is prosecuted.

The following facts affirmatively appear from the bill: Early in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. GregoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Tarbell v. PageIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Stowe v. FlaggIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Phillips v. PhillipsIllinois Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Loverin v. McLaughlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Garzo v. Maid of the Mist Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Marshall v. KeachIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Sun River Stock & Land Co. v. Montana Trust & Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Doty v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API