Legal Opinion

Carl FW Borgward, GMBH v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1958No. L. A. 25060Published

Macbeth & Ford and Moira Ford for Real Parties in Interest.

1Opinion of the Court

51 Cal.2d 72 (1958)

CARL F. W. BORGWARD, G.M.B.H. (a Corporation), Petitioner,

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; A. W. WOOLVERTON et al., Real Parties in Interest.

L. A. No. 25060.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Oct. 24, 1958.

Overton, Lyman & Prince, Eugene Overton and Ernest E. Johnson for Petitioner.

Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel, and William E. Lamoreaux, Assistant County Counsel, for Respondent.

Macbeth & Ford and Moira Ford for Real Parties in Interest.

TRAYNOR, J.

Petitioner, Carl F. W. Borgward G. M. B. H., a German corporation, seeks a writ of mandate to compel the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Henry R. Jahn & Son, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Mateo CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hilyar v. Union Ice Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. West Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Eclipse Fuel Engineering Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API