Legal Opinion

Cox v. Selover

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1929No. 27,216PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order denying his motion to open up a judgment for the purpose of permitting him to have fixed and inserted therein costs, and disbursements in his favor, and for allowance and inclusion therein of a sum for attorney’s fees incurred by him in the action; also for substituting as a party thereto, in place of George H. Selover, now deceased, the administrator of his estate.

Plaintiff brought suit on a promissory note. The litigation extended over a period of some three years. An appeal to this court is reported in 171 Minn. 216, 213 N. W. 902. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richardson v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Morehart v. FurleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Closen v. AllenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. Cox v. SeloverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Mielke v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bogestad v. BothumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Seagram-Distillers Corp. v. LangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Seagram-Distillers Corp. v. LangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API