Legal Opinion

Morehart v. Furley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1922No. 23,070PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover $2,831.55, the amount of real estate commission which he claimed to have earned in negotiating a sale of land for defendant. The complaint alleged that plaintiff negotiated the sale and that the purchaser as part of the purchase price executed to defendant a second mortgage for $8,900. It then alleged that it was agreed that the amount of the commission should constitute a lien upon the land. The complaint demanded judgment for $2,831.55 and interest, and asked that the court decree that said second mortgage be assigned to plaintiff in the amount of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cox v. McClureSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
  2. Levi v. LonginiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Adamson v. SundbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Morehart v. FurleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Hull v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Trust Created by Will of EngerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Ayer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Brown v. BertrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Marriage of Moberg v. MobergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Leraan v. Aftenro SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API