Legal Opinion

Mielke v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 19, 1900No. Nos, 12,037—(195)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Winona county in fayor of plaintiff, entered pursuant to the order of Snow, J.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

This action was begun in the municipal court of the city of Wi-nona. A rule of practice of that court provides that, where a party who is entitled to judgment upon a verdict or findings of the court neglects to enter the same for ten days after the verdict or notice of the filing of the findings, the opposing party may causé the same to be entered by the clerk on three days’ notice to the adverse party. On March 30, 1899, the court in this case filed its findings of fact and conclusions of law, to the effect that the plaintiff was entitled to recover from the defendant the sum of $22.45, with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richardson v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Dillon v. PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ColbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Cox v. SeloverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Kearney v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API