Legal Opinion

Seagram-Distillers Corp. v. Lang

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 20, 1950No. 35,045Published

1Opinion of the Court

230 Minn. 118 (1950)

SEAGRAM-DISTILLERS CORPORATION

v.

ROSE LANG, d.b.a. TOWER LIQUOR STORE.[1]

No. 35,045.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 20, 1950.

Morley, Cant, Taylor & Haverstock, for appellant.

Edward J. Callahan, Allen T. Rorem, and Kaplan, Edelman & Kaplan, for respondent.

PETERSON, JUSTICE.

Motion to dismiss an appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court sustaining a demurrer to the complaint upon the ground that the appeal was taken after judgment had been entered.

Defendant's demurrer to the complaint was sustained. Without notice to plaintiff, the clerk entered judgment for…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Willoughby v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Lundblad v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. American Button-Hole, Overseaming & Sewing Machine Co. v. GurneeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Harcum v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API