Richardson v. Rogers
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The plaintiff appeals from an order of the district court for Le Sueur county, Edson, J., presiding, refusing to allow or settle a proposed case. It appears from the record that judgment was entered in favor of the defendants, in the form recited in the opinion, on July 6, 1886, and it does not appear that the costs were ever inserted in the judgment. This appeal was taken on January 17,1887. Be-spondents move to dismiss the appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The plaintiff applied to the judge of the district court, upon order to show cause, for an allowance and settlement of the bill of exceptions prepared by him in the case, to which amendments had been duly served by defendant. The application was regular in form, but was denied, and the order discharged, and from the order denying such application the plaintiff appeals. The defendants move to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the time to appeal from the judgment has expired and no appeal has been taken, and that it is therefore too late to apply to the court for a settlement of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cord v. SouthwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- Champion v. Plymouth Congregational SocietyNew York Supreme Court · 1864
- Dorr v. MickleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
- Deering v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Andrews v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- McKenzie v. Bismarck Water Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Williams v. WaitSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Wilcox v. HedwallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Maurin v. CarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Perry v. State ex rel. SnyderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.