Finnegan v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MOTZ, District Judge.
The defendants, the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services and the Division of Parole and Probation, have filed a motion to dismiss the complaint filed against it by plaintiff, Marjorie Finnegan. Finnegan alleges violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”) on the basis of sex, including claims of disparate treatment, hostile work environment and retaliation. For the reasons that follow, I will grant in part and deny in part the defendants’ motion.
I
Finnegan began to work for the State…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Gloria W. DOWE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN ROANOKE VALLEY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Paul Carter v. William L. Ball, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Romeo v. APS Healthcare Bethesda, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Sherif v. University of Maryland Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Sewell v. Strayer UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Aly v. United States Department of TreasuryDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- Crawford v. Prince George's County Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.