Legal Opinion
Paul Carter v. William L. Ball, III
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 7, 1994No. 93-1762PublishedCited by 560 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge RESTANI wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge ERVIN and Senior Circuit Judge SPROUSE joined.
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
This appeal centers on the factual sufficiency of allegations of employment discrimination made by plaintiff-appellant Paul A. Carter, an African-American, against William L. Ball, III, the Secretary of the Navy (“the Navy”). At the end of Carter’s case-in-chief, the district court granted the Navy’s motion for dismissal. Carter argues on appeal that the district court erred in refusing to admit statistical evidence of discrimination and in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by560 opinions
- Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Foster v. University of Maryland-Eastern ShoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Gloria W. DOWE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN ROANOKE VALLEY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Felicia Strothers v. City of Laurel, MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Matthew Perkins v. International Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
555 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.